![]() I used Norton because it was free with my Comcast internet. It usually comes down to basic products like Malwarebytes Free that can run system scans on demand or on a schedule and have almost no ongoing resource demands, or premium products like those bundled in many for-pay AV suites that often include real-time monitoring, but with more system resource demand. There has been minor intrusiveness creep, and you have to do a custom install to prevent the browser plug-in from installing - their browser plug-in has historically been a bit too intrusive, and a plug-in is complement to, not a substitute for safe browsing habits, but overall the use experience is pretty reasonable.īecause not all forms of malware are targeted by basic anti-virus software, a malware scanner like Malwarebytes can be a beneficial extra layer of protection. I think they've been getting a lot less attention lately simply because their for-pay upgrade suite isn't as well-liked as the competition. It is still one of the top rated free anti-virus programs available. I went with AVG Free, which I've been using on other computers for years. It might be less resource intensive than in the past, but it disrupted by work too much with pop-up notifications or ads for upgrades. ![]() Since it was there, I let it be for a couple days to see if it has gotten better since I last tried it. I just bought a new laptop that had McAffee pre-installed. The for-pay suites do add some extra protection, but your basics are covered even if you stick with a good free program. Even the free versions of most 3rd party AV programs are sufficient for most users, so the recommendations of publications like PCMag and your own preferences for user interface are an adequate combined basis for making a decision. Overall, there's a surprising number of competent options, starting with the basic protection level of Windows Defender. I don't use anything on Android at the moment, just exercising care in app selection and Google's app scanning feature.īeware of recommendations and warnings for these packages that are not fairly current. I would use them again based on current characteristics. I have also used Norton, AVG and Avast in past years, also functioned well for me on Windows 7 and earlier systems. So both of our machines function well and have never been infected (could be luck, could be skill and care, could be software). All are free for me - isp supplies McAfee, Defender is supplied with Windows and Malwarebytes has a free version (the premium version does real-time scanning). ![]() They cover a lot of different software packages and update results frequently:Ĭurrently on our Windows 10 systems, I use the combo of Windows Defender and Malwarebytes on one machine, and McAfee and Malwarebytes on the other. Tests are pretty extensive, but are nicely summarized as to performance, protection and usability. These people test under various operating systems (you'll see selections for Mac, Windows and Android then you'll pick exact version). I've found this site to be particularly useful in assessing alternatives.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |